I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Силовые структуры，详情可参考51吃瓜
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00。夫子是该领域的重要参考
At capacity 1, every point gets its own cell, and the tree subdivides as deeply as possible. At capacity 10, many points coexist in the same node, and the tree stays shallow.